Connect with us

Politics

6 states and NYC sue US over immigration-related policy

Published

on

immigration-related policy

Six states and New York City sued the federal government Wednesday, joining other cities and states who say the government is trying to unlawfully force “sanctuary” communities to engage in federal immigration enforcement if they want anti-crime funds.

Lawsuits were filed in Manhattan federal court on behalf of New York state and city, Connecticut, New Jersey, Washington, Massachusetts and Virginia.

The federal government in July 2017 imposed conditions requiring cities receiving public safety grants to notify federal agents when immigrants in the country illegally are about to be released from police detention.

Since then, federal courts in Illinois, Pennsylvania and California have struck down the conditions affecting so-called “sanctuary” communities.

Justice Department spokesman Devin O’Malley called two lawsuits filed Wednesday “a disservice to these states’ law-abiding citizens.”

“By choosing not to comply with a federal statute that promotes cooperation between local jurisdictions and federal immigration authorities, political leaders deliberately choose to protect criminal aliens in their custody and to make their communities less safe,” he said.

The six states say they could lose a total of nearly $25 million in funds. In recent weeks, they were notified they must participate in the federal government’s immigration policies to receive their money, officials said.

New York City is one of five local governments eligible to receive the largest awards, with $4 million headed its way, authorities said.

“Our message is clear: the Trump Administration’s actions are illegal and morally bankrupt,” New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said in a release.

“We have proven, time and again, that welcoming immigrants has helped make this the safest big city in the country. Any attempt to jeopardize the trust between our local law enforcement and immigrant New Yorkers will fail,” de Blasio added.

The lawsuits seek a judge’s declaration that the policy change announced last year and enforced recently is unconstitutional.

Lawyers for the states wrote in court papers that the Justice Department was forcing states to accept unlawful conditions that diminish their ability to set their law enforcement priorities and protect their communities.

Zachary W. Carter, New York City’s corporation counsel, said the federal government’s efforts would cause immigrant communities to disengage from public service “and retreat into the shadows, to the detriment of their own safety and that of the public.”

The Justice Department has announced it is distributing $200 million in funds to communities that share its commitment to “keeping criminal aliens off our streets and our law-abiding citizens safe,” New York City said in its release.

In April, a federal appeals court in Chicago said the administration of President Donald Trump exceeded its authority when it established new conditions for cities to qualify for grants. But it issued a partial stay of a lower court’s order blocking the government until the full appeals court considers whether it was proper to block the federal government nationwide.

Besides Chicago, cities from California to Massachusetts have established policies to protect immigrants since Trump won the 2016 election.

“With the lawsuit filed today, New York and other states are sending a message loud and clear that we will not stand for intolerance or hate and we will not be bullied with disgraceful political tactics, let alone ones that are blatantly unconstitutional,” New York Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo said in a statement.

Source: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/states-nyc-sue-us-immigration-related-policy-56667275

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Cynthia Nixon Loses New York Primary to Incumbent Governor Andrew Cuomo

Published

on

By

cynthia nixon

Cynthia Nixon’s gubernatorial primary bid against incumbent Andrew Cuomo has come to an end.

Going into the primaries, Cuomo had a greater amount of support from the Democratic party, as well as greater financial resources than Nixon, and pre-primary polls suggested the incumbent governor had more support from New York voters.

The Associated Press called the race for Cuomo based on projected totals at 9:30 p.m. ET. With nearly 50 percent of total votes counted, the 60-year-old career politician held an insurmountable 66.3 percent lead over Nixon’s 33.7 percent.

Following the defeat, Nixon took to Twitter to thank her followers and fans for their support. “Thank you all for believing and fighting and leaving it all on the field,” she wrote. “We started something here in New York, and it doesn’t end today. This is just the beginning. And I know that together, we will win this fight.”

Nixon first announced that she would be running for governor, and challenging the two-term establishment Democrat, in March, when she released a video explaining her motivation and inspiration to throw her hat in the political ring.

“New York is my home. I’ve never lived anywhere else. When I grew up here it was just my mom and me in a one-bedroom, fifth floor walk-up. New York is where I was raised and where I am raising my kids. I’m a proud public school graduate and a prouder public school parent. I was given chances I just don’t see for most of New York’s kids today,” the 51-year-old actress said at the time. “Our leaders are letting us down. We are now the most unequal state in the entire country. With both incredible wealth and extreme poverty… How did we let this happen?”

Nixon first announced that she would be running for governor, and challenging the two-term establishment Democrat, in March, when she released a video explaining her motivation and inspiration to throw her hat in the political ring.

“New York is my home. I’ve never lived anywhere else. When I grew up here it was just my mom and me in a one-bedroom, fifth floor walk-up. New York is where I was raised and where I am raising my kids. I’m a proud public school graduate and a prouder public school parent. I was given chances I just don’t see for most of New York’s kids today,” the 51-year-old actress said at the time. “Our leaders are letting us down. We are now the most unequal state in the entire country. With both incredible wealth and extreme poverty… How did we let this happen?”

ET’s Nischelle Turner was with Parker on Thursday morning, hours before the results of the primary were determined — at the launch of her new brick-and-mortar shoe store, SJP By Sarah Jessica Parker, in the Seaport District of New York City — and the actress-turned-fashion mogul said she was standing by her friend.

“We had to be [at the store opening] super early but we’re we’re gonna go [cast our votes] when I finish,” shared Parker, who said she’d been texting with Nixon the night before the primaries kicked off.

Source: https://www.etonline.com/cynthia-nixon-loses-new-york-primary-to-incumbent-governor-andrew-cuomo-109624

Continue Reading

Politics

How the outcome of the AG primary could affect tech in NY

Published

on

By

attorney general eric schneiderman

This week, New York Democrats will line up to vote for one of four candidates vying to replace state Attorney General Barbara Underwood. In doing so, they’ll also decide who will take on the responsibility of regulating the state’s technology industry – a sector that has become an integral part of New York’s economy and increasingly dependent on state policy makers.

Underwood, who was appointed as former Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s replacement after he stepped down in May, has been an advocate for net neutrality on a national level, but has stayed relatively quiet on tech companies’ relationship with New York officials. Schneiderman, on the other hand, had a more complicated relationship with the tech community, taking on sports betting disruptors FanDuel and DraftKings and home-sharing service Airbnb during his tenure.

Now more than ever, the local tech community likely wants an attorney general who will have a proper understanding of the sector and the issues that affect it. Perhaps more importantly, the industry would want the next attorney general to be unaffected by the preferences of groups with roots in the city, and those groups’ relationships with city officials (see: the recent cap on the number of cars licensed by ride-hailing companies like Uber that have disrupted the well-connected New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission).

So how does each Democratic attorney general candidate fare in both categories? Considering the limited conversation around tech during the campaign, it’s hard to say definitively. But their past lives and their responses to a room full of NYC techies during a panel hosted by Axios, Tech:NYC and WeWork back in August provide some details.

Two of the four candidates have actually worked for a technology company. One of them, Leecia Eve, is a lobbyist for Verizon and on leave from her post as its vice president of government affairs for the tri-state region. She said during the panel that she understands “the role of technology better by far than (her) opponents,” alluding to her executive role at a telecommunications company, but her background also puts her in a complicated position. She, like all three of her opponents, presents herself as a strong proponent of net neutrality. “My company, Verizon, has never engaged and never will engage in paid prioritization,” she said at the WeWork panel in August. “No blocking. No throttling.” But Verizon has been called out for that exact offense – and against California firefighters who thought they had unlimited data, no less. Democratic senators in Washington have since asked the FCC to investigate, and while Eve isn’t directly responsible, it does speak to the complicated nature of her loyalties.

Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, meanwhile, was the chief operating officer of a New York-based software startup called Kiodex, Inc. from 2000 to 2003. He’s able to speak fluently about the importance of H1B visas to tech companies and of innovation to New York City, spoke most vehemently against the Uber cap during the panel, and told eager attendees more than once that the attorney general should be their partner. He displayed a strong understanding of the issues associated with trying to marry emerging tech with an established (sometimes antiquated) governing system.

“I’ve spent 10 years practicing law in this city … but it doesn’t mean you can’t stand on your own two feet and answer a simple question like whether you support the cap or not,” Maloney said. “Because what’s really going on with that question is whether you support the old school political bosses and political interests in this city or whether you support innovation and you are willing to deal with the disruptions and manage them as you go, because if you put an artificial cap on it, you are going to retard the creative atmosphere that all of you are working so hard to create it. And I’m opposed to it.”

On the other hand, it would be risky to assume that the congressman would prioritize these issues should he win, completely unaffected by the needs or wants of outside groups. “Maloney my guess is probably personally the most pro-tech of that group, so that’s good,” political strategist and venture capitalist Bradley Tusk told City & State. “But you know, he’s also very political.”

With the exception of net neutrality, New York City Public Advocate Letitia James has been perhaps the least committal of the candidates on tech issues. She said she thinks Uber raises a lot of social justice issues but “disagree(s) with the approach of the vote (and) think(s) there should have been more analysis.”

On data privacy, she said she believes in government access to open data to address social justice issues in New York, says it’s important that business disclose what data they gather, and that personal data not be abused and “is clearly protected.”

If Maloney appeared to be the most informed candidate, James came away looking as the least. And aside from presiding over the New York City Council during votes like the one on the Uber cap, her background has little to no connection to the tech industry.

Zephyr Teachout was the only one of the four candidates has explicitly come out in support of the Uber cap bill. “I support the Uber cap bill,” she said on Twitter. “We need to reduce congestion, break up concentrated power, and support drivers. Too many drivers have been squeezed out by big tech companies that steal all the money – and the dignity – from drivers.”

She avoided weighing in on the Uber cap during the WeWork panel, although she was asked many times to take a side. Instead, she repeated the need for an AG to prioritize, outlining her own priorities as being voting, corruption, campaign finance reform and mass incarceration – basically, nothing tech-related. She spoke out forcefully against monopolies too, and expressed her concern about the concentration of tech in New York City.

But when it comes to enforcing the law, Teachout – an associate law professor at Fordham Law School who has never been in elected office or had any company affiliation – gives the tech community reason to think she would regulate fairly. An added advantage? Tim Wu, the man who coined the term “net neutrality,” was her running mate during her 2014 gubernatorial campaign, and her allegiance to net neutrality doesn’t stop there. She told the panel attendees that she “did a crowd-sourced brief defending the open internet” – bonus points for tech lingo.

Source: https://www.cityandstateny.com/articles/politics/campaigns-elections/how-outcome-ag-primaries-could-affect-tech-ny.html

Continue Reading

Politics

De Blasio says Cuomo lacks ‘a positive vision for New York City’

Published

on

By

de blasio

It’s a Democratic demolition derby.

Mayor Bill de Blasio on Thursday tore into Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s handling of New York City’s needs, a day after the governor faced off against his primary rival Cynthia Nixon in a televised debate.

In the face-off with the left-wing actress-activist, Cuomo had been asked about two issues that have raised tensions with the mayor: funding the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the increased deployment of state police officers to the city.

In the debate, the governor repeated previous claims that the city in fact owns the subway system and bears responsibility for it—the former is legally true, though the MTA is a gubernatorially-controlled entity and manages the system—and that his officers are simply in place to catch those attempting to evade tolls at state and MTA-controlled bridges and tunnels.

The mayor, however, argued that governor has failed to take the city’s best interests into account when setting policy, despite it containing 43% of New York’s population. He alluded to several episodes in their ongoing feud, including the governor’s sudden decision to shut down the subways system ahead of an anticipated snowstorm, an action taken without notifying City Hall.

“I think it’s been part of a pattern of the governor not having a positive vision for New York City and how to work with New York City,” the mayor complained. “No other state in America has a single city with a higher percentage of its population than we have in New York City, in New York state. We’re almost half of the state’s population. Why not start with a positive vision for how to help New York City, for how to work with me as mayor and my administration, and how to get things done for New York City? That’s not what I get. I get sudden announcements, and plans that are often made without taking New York City’s needs into account.”

De Blasio continued to withhold any endorsement in the primary between Cuomo and Nixon, the latter of whom supported him for office in 2013 and hired consultants tied to his campaign. But he praised her performance in the bitter, carping exchange with the incumbent, and slapped at the governor’s “tone.”

“By the standard of how much experience each one had debating, I would say she won, because her performance far exceeded expectations. I would also say she offered some very powerful views that I thought resonated. And I was surprised at some of the governor’s tone,” he said. “His tone was negative and I didn’t understand how someone who is doing well in the polls and has $30 million [in campaign contributions] and is an incumbent would take such a negative tone.”

In a response Thursday afternoon, Cuomo’s team slapped at the governor’s rival and former ally, whom the governor professed to “love” at the debate. In particular, the Cuomo camp highlighted internal emails reporters forced City Hall to release that showed Nixon used her access to de Blasio to pass along complaints about helicopter traffic over Shakespeare in the Park performances and a message from the owner of a Manhattan tea house patronized by “Sex and the City” co-star Sarah Jessica Parker.

“As evidenced by the way he approaches governing, we’re not surprised that the mayor thinks Ms. Nixon has the experience and qualifications to be chief executive,” said campaign spokeswoman Lis Smith, whose romance with former Gov. Eliot Spitzer derailed her appointment to a job in de Blasio’s administration. “Clearly, he and Ms. Nixon—one of his large donors—have a very close relationship, as evidenced by the access she has had to him as mayor, which allowed her to call in favors for her wealthy friends and co-stars. Nice to see she can still call in those favors with him today.”

Source: http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20180830/POLITICS/180839987/de-blasio-says-cuomo-lacks-a-positive-vision-for-new-york-city

Continue Reading

Trending

TransportationVoice