Connect with us

Uber, lyft and other taxis

The Air Taxi Challenges Uber Isn’t Considering



air taxi new york

Breaking into the urban air mobility market means a lot of challenges that a company new to the game has no way of accounting for, according to Itai Shoshani, CEO and chief pilot for New York helicopter charter Zip Aviation.

“People think they’re going to wait for a helicopter with an Uber sign on it,” Shoshani said. “They’re going to learn this is different than a car service. It’s a completely different world. If I was Uber, I would steer clear of this.”

Of course, it isn’t just Uber. While it is perhaps the most visible company on the forefront of the imminent-seeming air taxi revolution, there are some 150-plus companies developing vehicles for that purpose and almost every major player in aviation is at least dipping its toe into the waters.

Boeing, whose eVTOL prototype took its first flight earlier this year, is investigating both vehicle technology and infrastructure to support the inclusion of this type of traffic into the national airspace system. Airbus is partnering with Audi on a planned air-and-ground system in an attempt to fill every bit of the customers’ needs, a la Uber, with an autonomous modular pod that attached to both a rotor construct and a wheelbase.

Embraer has a division working with Uber, as does Bell. Rolls-Royce is working on eVTOL engines, after initial skepticism. Honeywell; Thales; Lockheed Martin’s Sikorsky. In one capacity or another, all the big companies are trying to make sure they don’t miss out on a new industry that could be as “important in aviation as the dawn of the jet age.”

And beyond industry, the FAA and NASA in the U.S., EASA in Europe and a host of other regulators are hard at work figuring out how best to facilitate this new mode of transportation. Vehicles that are a bit different from anything that has previously existed need certification and strain a system that generally develops certifications by association; that is, adjusting pre-existing rules that most closely apply. Infrastructure needs building to support tracking traffic relatively low to the ground in urban centers; policies need to be formed to facilitate integration into current air traffic flows and the jobs being done by air traffic controllers; and that’s before even getting into the additional challenges posed by proposed autonomy.

Industry is working with government on these issues, and there is a sense of confidence that they will be solved, at least among those whose success depends on solving them. But space for an industry and seeing dollar signs isn’t enough to ensure that companies will correctly navigate unfamiliar terrain, according to Shoshani. Aviation isn’t all the same.

Commercial aviation companies “haven’t operated in a place like New York City, where you have three airports overlaying each other,” Shoshani said. “They haven’t dealt with the issues [charter helicopter companies] have. It’s not like an airline; you’re not going to have people just line up and stand and get tickets.”

Like many skeptics, Shoshani thinks the timeframe — companies such as Uber want to have air taxis in the sky within five years — is unrealistic, because the lack of infrastructure and regulation will prevent the industry from getting off the ground.

“I’m not worried, per se, but these are things that can take time,” he said. “Before 2030, it’s not even a chance.”

He admits that the vehicle technology “is there” but says “it’s not a practical machine,” and more development is needed until today’s air taxis can fill more missions.

“People talk about demos, it’s not about users, about what the mission can possibly be,” he said. “It’s going to have to be short hops,” in the near-term because that’s what current battery technology will allow.

“That is not an entire market,” he continued. “Uber is a $13 billion company. The entire helicopter industry is a $400 million industry. How are we going to get a point that what we do with drones [autonomous vehicles] is going to be enough to keep them interested for any amount of time? We’re talking about a small piece of helicopter business.”

A lot of ink has been spilled over the pilot shortage and how urban air mobility companies are going to combat it. In the long-term, the goal is autonomy. Shoshani buys into unmanned vehicles but is skeptical of autonomous ones without one-to-one remote-pilot oversight.

“The FAA traditionally wants someone, one person, in charge that if, God forbid, something happens, they can point at and say, ‘bad,'” he said.

That’s further down the line, anyway, though. In the short term, Uber has suggested using autonomy to off-load much of the pilot’s responsibilities, thus allowing them to broaden the field of suitable pilot candidates, perhaps from commercial helicopter pilots to certified pilots at large.

“That’s just stupid,” Shoshani said.

While he thinks any pilot should be the most qualified available, he doesn’t believe airline, GA, or helicopter pilots should be flying the air taxi mission.

“FAA and regulators, ICAO, are going to need to come up with a new type of pilots,” he said. “Not going to be from fixed-wing or from helicopter, but from drone pilots.

“They need to have a drone pilot” he continued. “Not other pilots. Because, again, it’s a specific mission. You might as well just say ‘Hey, let’s grab kids that are really good at video games.’ They’re just as qualified as a pilot that came off a fixed-wing.”

He firmly believes in the need for mission-specific pilots, which he thinks Uber is not considering. “They keep seeing it like drivers; it’s not like [how] you have drivers out there on the street. You can’t do that in a helicopter.”

While charter companies don’t have not-yet-existent drone pilots in their ranks, they do have people familiar with the mission, which is why Shoshani thinks they can help.

“I believe the helicopter charter industry is the only one equipped to fly that kind of mission,” he said. “The charter companies know how to do this operation. They’re the ones who know the local operations, how to load unload, regulations.”

He also pitched their ability to supplement early air taxis with helicopters, depending on the ride’s requirements.

It’s not a one-way street, either. Despite his skepticism of the timeline and confidence in some bumps and bruises, Shoshani said he’s convinced that urban air mobility is going to happen and eVTOL vehicles will eventually change the landscape of the industry. Charter companies need to accept that, he said.

“The companies that aren’t going to accept the fact that Uber and these big companies are in the game … they’re going to hurt.”

Right now, Uber is focused on its own enabling technologies, but Shoshani said he would not be surprised if that changed as the rideshare giant begins to realize the intricacies inherent to setting up its air taxis in these cities.

“It would not be at all surprising if they partnered [with] or bought out some of those companies” in the next year or so, he said.

That would also be a benefit to companies like Zip who are looking to secure their future in a world that’s on the verge of major changes with a big influx of capital. They may have a good shot if they can prove to the newcomers that they have something valuable to offer, as Shoshani says.


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uber, lyft and other taxis

Taxi drivers should be exempt from NYC congestion pricing, council members say




taxi drivers should

Yellow cabbies should be exempted from congestion pricing tolls coming to Manhattan as well as a surcharge that is already in place, according to two City Council members.

Councilmen Ydanis Rodriguez and Fernando Cabrera on Tuesday called on Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the MTA to establish the carveout before the new tolls take effect, which is expected in 2021. Their request came in response to an extensive investigation from The New York Times detailing how thousands of immigrant workers fell victim to predatory loans that saddled them with crippling debt, as lenders fattened their pockets and the government ignored warning signs.

“Our taxi drivers are currently facing a financial epidemic unlike we’ve ever seen. This crisis … did not happen overnight,” said Rodriguez, the chair of the Transportation Committee. “This is the result of an accumulation of lack of leadership and bad decisions for many decades.”

Yellow taxis and other for-hire vehicles are already subjected to a congestion pricing surcharge, which took effect in February. Yellow cabs operating in Manhattan below 96th Street saw an added $2.50 fee on top of the $5.50 base fare just to get in the vehicle. Ubers, Lyfts and other car services driving in the area are hit with a $2.75 surcharge.

The surcharge has angered the professional driving industry and arrived amid a series of driver suicides, which advocates have blamed on economic hardships plaguing the industry.

But the request to be exempt from the surcharge and a future toll flies in the face of transportation experts and environmental advocates who have argued exceptions would lessen the impact of the policy — both from the standpoint of traffic reduction and transit funding.

Rodriguez and Cabrera, the later of whom opposes congestion pricing outright, are the latest politicians to speak out following the Times’ investigation, though the issues had been reported before and overlooked by city, state and federal elected officials. New York Attorney General Letitia James announced an investigation into lending practices around taxi medallions and Mayor Bill de Blasio followed with a separate investigation into the brokers involved in arranging the loans.

“The review will set down strict new rules that prevent broker practices that hurt drivers,” de Blasio said in a statement. “It’s unacceptable to prey on hardworking New Yorkers trying to support their families and we’ll do all that we can to put an end to it.”

It’s not clear yet what impact the congestion surcharges will have on the yellow cab industry, though the former commissioner of the city’s Taxi & Limousine Commission predicted they would be “devastating.” Yellow taxi trips have actually increased slightly as the new fees took effect, from 247,315 average daily trips in January of this year to 252,634 in March. But monthly averages tend to have sizable fluctuations and trips are still down when you compare that three-month span to the same point last year — part of a long downward slide in trips that came as e-hails like Uber and Lyft flooded the city with cars.

The MTA and the governor’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

“Without an exemption from the congestion surcharge, taxi drivers — whether they are lease-drivers or owner-drivers — simply won’t earn enough to survive, even if their expenses go down,” said Bhairavi Desai, the executive director of the New York Taxi Workers Alliance.


Continue Reading

Uber, lyft and other taxis

One in 6 Uber and Lyft Cars Have Open Safety Recalls, Consumer Reports’ Study Suggests




uber lyft

Among the tens of thousands of Uber and Lyft vehicles registered to operate in New York City, there’s a 2011 Hyundai Sonata GLS with eight unaddressed safety recalls that range from a potential seat-belt detachment to even more alarming examples, such as possible engine failure.

Millions of riders rely on ride-hailing services Uber and Lyft for daily transportation. But according to a Consumer Reports review of data from New York City and the Seattle area, a notable number of ride-hail vehicles registered for Uber and Lyft service, about 1 in 6, carry unaddressed safety defects.

“Uber and Lyft are letting down their customers and jeopardizing their trust,” says William Wallace, a CR safety policy advocate. “Uber’s website says people can ‘ride with confidence,’ while Lyft promises ‘peace of mind,’ yet both companies fail to ensure that rideshare cars are free from safety defects that could put passengers at risk.”

As Uber and Lyft announced becoming multibillion-dollar IPOs earlier this year, CR decided to check on the safety of the privately owned vehicles that are key to company operations and are now used by more than 100 million consumers.

CR reviewed safety records for about 94,000 vehicles registered as operating for the companies in NYC and King County, Wash. (home to Seattle), two major ride-hailing hubs with local governments that require drivers to register vehicles and obtain an additional license to work through regulators. The CR analysis of the data is meant to provide a snapshot of open safety recalls among ride-hailing cars in the industry, but it might not reflect the national market.

We found vehicles with glaring issues that pose serious risks, such as deadly Takata airbags that could hurt or kill the driver or front-seat passengers. There were unfixed defects involving the potential for vehicles to catch fire or for engines to lose power entirely. For example, one of the 2011 Sonata’s open recall notices says, “Engine failure would result in a vehicle stall, increasing the risk of a crash.”

It’s unclear whether any ride-hail customer or driver has been injured because of an issue related to an open safety recall, and the rate of open recalls we found for registered ride-hail vehicles in our investigation is about the same rate estimated for all vehicles on the road. But as Uber and Lyft aim to transform daily transportation for consumers, they’ve taken only minor steps to ensure their drivers get recalls addressed, CR’s review found. And that could have unintended consequences for the riding public.

CR thinks stronger safety recall laws are needed, especially as Uber and Lyft work to grow their business in the coming years and as other smaller players enter the industry.

Uber and Lyft allow vehicles on their platforms as long as they are legally registered and no more than 10 to 15 years old, depending on the area where they’re located. Local ordinances may be more restrictive, with requirements for a vehicle inspection or for drivers to obtain a legal permit to work. But neither company has a black-and-white policy in place regarding all open recalls.

In response to our questions, Uber and Lyft said they’ve taken a number of steps to address unfixed recalls in vehicles on their platforms. Uber, in particular, says it encourages and reminds drivers to get recalls fixed, and it identifies and blocks vehicles on its platform that have some of the most dangerous open recalls, ones with “DO NOT DRIVE” warnings from the manufacturer or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Those warnings, however, make up only a sliver of all vehicles on the road with unaddressed recalls.

“Uber, Lyft, taxi companies, and anyone offering for-hire rides should check cars for open recalls, and ban any with unrepaired safety defects from picking up passengers,” CR’s Wallace says. “If they won’t do so, states and local governments should make them.”

CR’s review also found that:

About 1 in 6: Of the 93,958 vehicle identification numbers (VINs) associated with ride-hailing vehicles in New York City and King County, Wash., that CR examined, 15,175, or 16.2 percent, had one or more open safety recalls. (Because ride-hailing drivers can work for more than one company, we grouped results together for vehicles associated with Uber, Lyft, and, for New York, smaller competitors Juno and Via.)

Takata: A number of vehicles have outstanding recalls associated with numerous deaths, such as faulty airbags made by Japanese car-parts manufacturer Takata. Those airbags have been linked to 24 deaths across the world, including 16 in the U.S., and remain in 1,274 of the vehicles cited in CR’s review, about 1.4 percent of the total.

Problem vehicles: Some vehicles had a significant number of open safety recalls: 25 vehicles in the Seattle area and NYC had at least five or more unfixed recalls.

On a par with all private vehicles: The Uber and Lyft vehicles we looked at are about on a par with all personal vehicles on the road. Our analysis also found the open recall rate for some other for-hire vehicle services in NYC to be slightly higher. CR reviewed more than 32,000 VINs affiliated with for-hire vehicles, such as traditional taxis, limos, and liveries, and found the open recall rate for that group to be 23.6 percent.

Cars older than a decade: The ride-hailing companies both have varying standards for vehicle eligibility, depending on the city or type of service, but there appear to be slips in enforcing the rules. In Seattle, for example, Uber and Lyft currently say vehicles should be no more than a decade old. But CR’s review of records from King County found more than 40 cars licensed to operate there with a listed vehicle model year of 2007 or older. Uber says under King County regulations enacted in March, permits will no longer be issued to drivers with vehicles more than a decade old. Lyft says it considers any vehicle with a current window decal that’s legally needed to drive as valid to operate on its platform.

Onus on drivers: Uber and Lyft take only minor steps to ensure open recalls are addressed, leaving the onus primarily on drivers.
Ride-hail companies conduct their operations through intuitive smartphone apps that allow customers to quickly request nearby vehicles to come and pick them up. The fare amount is predetermined based on the pickup spot and destination requested, as well as consumer demand. The service is meant to be a quick and easy transaction.

To get a snapshot of the industry’s open recall rate, CR obtained VINs for ride-share vehicles operating in NYC and King County, Wash., as of January this year. VIN data for drivers in the industry are scarce, but NYC and King County produced them in an online database and in response to a public records request, respectively. With the numbers, we were able to track down which vehicles had unaddressed recalls, in the same way any consumer can check on their own vehicle or a used car they might want to buy.

We processed the VINs through a tool that checks to see whether a car still has an open recall. The tool was developed by Carfax, which allows consumers to monitor whether their car has an open recall either through their website or, if hailing a ride through Uber or Lyft, on an app called myCarfax.

Billion-Dollar Valuations
Consumer advocates say Uber and Lyft, with their billion-dollar valuations and technological prowess, can—and should—do far more to ensure consumers are kept safe, and reduce the open recall rate. For example, some advocates point out that Uber and Lyft could use VINs to identify and ban vehicles with open recalls from operating on their platforms.

“Uber and Lyft have the ability to have zero recalled cars on their platforms at the push of a button,” says Jason Levine, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety. “They both claim to be technology companies yet refuse to use that technology to take this obvious step to decrease the danger from unrepaired recalls on their drivers and customers.”

Uber and Lyft launched initial public offerings this year to sell shares on Wall Street, even as they faced criticism about the economic feasibility of their business models and labor conditions for their drivers. The ride-share platforms—Uber and Lyft are by far the biggest in the U.S.—rely on contract workers using their private vehicles, a largely unregulated relationship.

There are risks to their gameplan. The profits may never materialize, for one thing, and the model itself is predicated on a host of what-if scenarios, including the potential liability both can face with issues such as car crashes. Uber, for example, made clear to prospective investors in its filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that it may be subject to “claims of significant liability based on traffic accidents, deaths, injuries, or other incidents.”

What the Companies Say
Uber and Lyft representatives told CR in written statements that a number of initiatives are in place to encourage drivers to address recalls.

Uber says it recognizes the role it can play “in helping keep the roads safe for everyone.”

“As part of our commitment, we’re proactively blocking vehicles with open recalls that include a ‘Do Not Drive’ notice from the manufacturer or NHTSA from the app until they have taken action on their vehicle,” an Uber spokesperson tells CR.

Uber regularly reminds drivers and provides resources to check their vehicles for open recalls, the company says, and it participates in the NHTSA biannual campaign to raise awareness about getting recalls fixed.

Lyft told CR that it works with lawmakers and regulators, including local elected officials, to create rules and regulations around vehicle safety. Lyft added that by using personal vehicles, drivers are representing that their vehicles meet industry safety standards and legal requirements.

“Lyft drivers use their personal vehicles to drive on the platform—the same car they use in their daily lives, driving their kids to school or friends around town,” Lyft says in a statement. “Drivers have a strong personal incentive to make sure their car is in a safe operating condition.”

Ride-share drivers do have the option to work for multiple companies. In King County, drivers who meet the requirements for a Transportation Network Company license can currently drive for four companies—Uber, Lyft, and smaller competitors Moovn and Wingz. (CR’s public records request from King County covered only drivers who registered for a license to drive with an affiliation to Uber or Lyft, which represents a majority of licensed drivers in the area.)

It’s slightly more complicated in NYC. Drivers there have a TLC license issued by the Taxi and Limousine Commission, which acts like a “universal” license, meaning the drivers can work within several transit sectors, including black car services and even traditional cabs, says Allan Fromberg, deputy commissioner for public affairs at the NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission, which regulates for-hire vehicles in the city.

CR’s analysis of NYC vehicles included VINs associated with Uber, Lyft, and two of their smaller competitors in the city, Via and Juno. The VINs and owners are published on the city’s Open Data website.

Lax Regulations
One of the vehicles CR reviewed in the Seattle area is a 2011 Ford Fusion SE, which records show has five open recalls, including an unfixed Takata airbag. It’s not unusual for a passenger to sit up front if they’re using one of the companies’ lower-cost shared-ride options—Uber Pool or Lyft Line.

“If an Uber or Lyft car is under recall for a faulty Takata airbag on the passenger side and this safety defect hasn’t been fixed, then a passenger would be taking on significant risk sitting in the front seat,” CR’s Wallace says. “Defective Takata airbags have killed people when they explode with excessive force, sending shrapnel into the cabin of the car.”

Federal and state regulations offer little official guidance for ride-hailing companies related to open recalls.

Federal auto safety regulator NHTSA has the power to order a recall, but it doesn’t have direct oversight of Uber and Lyft, only the manufacturers of vehicles operating on the ride-hailing networks. California recently passed a law that requires startups that provide a market for “peer-to-peer” car rentals, such as Turo and Getaround, to check for recalls. But the law doesn’t apply to ride-hailing companies, such as Uber and Lyft.

“The new law benefits not only the consumers who drive the cars they find on those platforms but also the vehicle owners, who too often don’t get the safety recall notices from the manufacturers, and may be totally unaware their car is unsafe and needs to be repaired,” says Rosemary Shahan, president of Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, a national watchdog group based in California that supported the legislation.

“Uber and Lyft would be wise to adopt the same practices the rental car companies have adopted nationally, and Turo and Getaround have adopted in California, rather than waiting for a high-profile tragedy to occur before they screen out vehicles with unrepaired safety recalls,” she says.

NYC yellow cabs are required to pass three inspections each year in order to operate on the road, but that doesn’t include a check for safety recalls. Same goes for vehicles that are certified to receive a “for-hire vehicle” license, which includes Uber and Lyft drivers. They’re also required to receive three inspections by New York state, but not a check for open recalls.

“We’ve been checking for open recalls, but administratively and not as a part of the vehicle inspection process,” says Fromberg, the deputy commissioner for public affairs at the NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission.

Drivers have a balancing act of sorts to consider when it comes to their vehicles: safety, of course, but also their bottom line. Aleksey Medvedovskiy, president of NYC Taxi Group, a fleet of cabs based in Brooklyn, says that he wants to “make sure our cars are working nonstop.”

“We don’t necessarily bring the car into the dealer to get it fixed,” Medvedovskiy says. “We check through the website, we check what open bulletins they have … If the vehicle gets to a dealer, it can sit there for days until it gets back on the road, and that’s what we don’t want.”

If it’s a major issue, such as a faulty brake pump, the vehicles are brought into the dealer to address the recall with the manufacturer, he says. But if a transmission breaks or there’s a problem with the tire wall, it’s easier to bring it into the taxi company’s repair shop.

“We fix them as we go,” he says. But if they consider the recall to be a safety defect, he says, they “react instantly.”

The situation for taxi drivers who own their cabs is similar to those who drive for Uber and Lyft: They receive recall notices; they have to get cars fixed on their own.

“Inspections are the responsibility of the vehicle’s owner or lessee, in the case of long­-term leases and lease-­to-­own agreements, a category that includes many Uber/Lyft drivers,” Fromberg says. Recalls are the responsibility of owners, too, he says.

A Lack of Information
In many cities where Uber and Lyft operate, the companies ask for standard information—driver’s license and insurance, records of a vehicle inspection—for drivers to sign up. Some municipalities go further and require a permit or business license for drivers to operate, such as in Los Angeles or Clark County, Nev.

NYC publishes a continuously updated list of ride-hailing affiliated VINs on its Open Data website, and King County made a list of VINs for active Uber and Lyft drivers available to CR in response to a public records request. The City of Chicago, however, denied CR’s request for VINs, citing privacy laws and arguments made by Uber and Lyft.

In a letter dated Dec. 28, 2018, Lyft said that disclosure of VINs would violate the privacy of drivers and claimed that it possesses “significant” economic value in keeping them secret.

“If Lyft’s driver information is disclosed, a competitor could enter the market, or increase its market share, without substantial development by ‘free-riding’ on Lyft’s driver list,” the letter said.

Chicago agreed, saying that “proprietary information that would cause competitive harm is exempt from production.”

What Consumers Can Do
If consumers want to stay apprised of whether the ride-hail car they call to pick them up has a safety defect, one solution is to download the myCarfax app.

Once an Uber or Lyft rider is connected with a driver, they’ll receive details about the driver’s car, including the license plate number. From there, they can open myCarfax and punch in the license plate number of the vehicle, which then immediately reveals whether or not it has an open safety recall.


Continue Reading

Uber, lyft and other taxis

How New York taxi drivers were conned and bankrupted by medallion loan sharks




medallion taxi

“I don’t think I could concoct a more predatory scheme if I tried. This was modern-day indentured servitude.” That’s what Roger Bertling, the senior instructor at Harvard Law School’s clinic on predatory lending and consumer protection told The New York Times about sleazy operators who hyper-inflated the price of taxi medallions (which allow you to own a taxi in New York) and bankrupted drivers who took out loans to buy them.

From the article:

“People love to blame banks for things that happen because they’re big bad banks,” said Robert Familant, the former head of Progressive Credit Union, a small nonprofit that specialized in medallion loans. “We didn’t do anything, in my opinion, other than try to help small businesspeople become successful.”

Mr. Familant made about $30 million in salary and deferred payouts during the bubble, including $4.8 million in bonuses and incentives in 2014, the year it burst, according to disclosure forms.


Continue Reading