Connect with us


Was James Brown murdered? More than a dozen people want his death investigated



james brown

In a new bombshell investigation, 13 people say they suspect James Brown did not die of natural causes.

In a three-part investigation by CNN, published Tuesday, more than a dozen people who knew the late singer say they want a criminal investigation into his death or would like the singer’s body to be exhumed for an autopsy.

After Brown died on Dec. 25, 2006, at age 73, his official cause of death was listed as congestive heart failure, resulting from complications of pneumonia.

One of the nearly 140 people interviewed for the CNN piece was Dr. Marvin Crawford, the doctor who treated Brown at an Atlanta hospital prior to his death and the one who signed his death certificate. Crawford now says he too doubts Brown died of natural cause. Instead, he believes it was an overdose, accidental or otherwise.

Brown’s condition “changed too fast,” Crawford told CNN.

“He was a patient I would never have predicted would have coded,” referring to a medical slang term used to describe a patient in cardiopulmonary arrest. “But he died that night, and I did raise that question: What went wrong in that room?”

Another event that prompted suspicion was the seemingly ever-changing official story of Brown’s death from his personal manager at the time, Charles Bobbit. Those interviewed by CNN said Bobbit’s story “didn’t make sense” and described it as “always a little vague.”

Andre Moses White, a friend who helped Brown check into the hospital in December 2006, told the outlet that he was so convinced Brown’s death wasn’t what it appeared that he took a vial of the singer’s blood from an IV tube shortly after Brown’s death in hopes authorities could use it to investigate. Brown’s daughter, Yamma Brown, declined to provide the news outlet with a statement regarding why the family declined to have an autopsy performed at the time of her father’s death.

Questions have also been raised as to whether Brown’s body is in the crypt in his daughter Deanna Brown Thomas’s yard. She did not respond to CNN’s questions regarding the location of her late father’s body.

The investigation also examines the death of Brown’s third wife, Adrienne Brown, and delves into the legendary singer’s past.

Although police found no foul play in Adrienne Brown’s Jan. 6, 1996, death, her friend Jacque Hollander told CNN that she believes otherwise.

CNN obtained the pages of a confidential informant’s notebook from Steve Miller, the retired detective who investigated Adrienne’s death. In the 2001 notebook, the informant, who has since died, alleges that a doctor confessed to murdering Adrienne Brown, 45, with a fatal drug overdose. The doctor in question denied the allegations to CNN.

Hollander also alleges that she was raped by James Brown in 1988, which she says she told his wife Adrienne about at the time. Brown was never prosecuted.

Police reports from the time of their marriage show Adrienne claimed her husband became violent with her around the same time. Brown was arrested after a neighbor confirmed to police that she saw the singer pull a trigger on Adrienne, the bullet of which hit her car tire and trunk.

According to Hollander, Adrienne said the case against her husband had disappeared because she had been told to drop the charges or be killed.

USA TODAY has reached out to the Brown family attorney for comment on the allegations.


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


31 NY airports splitting $23.6M from state for upgrades




airport new york

More than two dozen airports statewide are splitting $23.6 million in infrastructure funding provided by New York state.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced Wednesday that the state funding has been awarded to 31 airports to support safety enhancements and modernization efforts. The Democrat says the funds come from an aviation grant program that complements an upstate airport revitalization competition that has provided $200 million in state funding.

The latest round of funding will be used to build new airplane hangars and fuel facilities, improve safety and security, and expand vehicle parking facilities.

The funding is going to airports in the Albany area, central New York, Finger Lakes region, Long Island, Mid-Hudson region, Mohawk Valley, North Country, Southern Tier and western New York.


Continue Reading


New York City lied to FEMA about vehicles damaged in Hurricane Sandy, agrees to pay $5.3 million




thousands of vehicles damaged

A hurricane of lies about city-owned Department of Transportation vehicles supposedly damaged by Superstorm Sandy has resulted in a $5.3 million settlement with the feds.

The agreement between New York City and federal prosecutors was revealed in papers filed Wednesday in Manhattan Federal Court. After the October 2012 storm that killed 43 people and caused $19 billion in property damage, FEMA offered federal money to replace damaged city-owned vehicles.

In 2014, a DOT deputy commissioner, who was not identified in papers, certified a list of 132 vehicles the agency claimed were wrecked by the apocalyptic flood. But in reality, many of the vehicles had been out of commission for years, papers show.

Some of the vehicles on the list — which included passenger cars, heavy equipment and commercial vehicles — had been “junk for years,” a DOT employee wrote the deputy commissioner.
FEMA would not have agreed to pay NYCDOT any of these funds had it known that the certifications were false and that many of the vehicles listed…were ineligible,” prosecutors wrote.
In one example, DOT sought $3 million for seven street pavers that had been designated for salvage years before Sandy.

Of those seven, the agency reported to the NYPD in 2009 that five paving machines “are sitting under the highway in the dump for seven years and were being pick(ed) apart by vandals stealing brass fittings, copper wire harnesses and anything else they could sell for scrap,” according to papers.
Nevertheless, DOT sought FEMA money to replace the pavers.

In another example, the city sought FEMA money for a trash pump and trailer, though both were taken out of service in 2010.

The settlement between the city and federal prosecutors requires the approval of a federal judge. The $5.3 million settlement includes the city relinquishing a claim to $1 million it expected to receive from FEMA.

The agreement notes that the city and DOT “did not undertake a sufficient review” of the list of damaged vehicles. The DOT deputy commissioner also “lacked personal knowledge” sufficient to sign off on the list.

“FEMA serves a critical role in providing emergency relief to those who are tragically struck by disaster. When people lie to FEMA about the cause of property damage in order to reap a windfall, it compromises FEMA’s ability to provide financial assistance to legitimate disaster victims in desperate need,” Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman said.

The DOT on Wednesday said it had taken steps to “reduce the risk of this ever happening again.”
“In 2016, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District alerted DOT that reimbursement claims submitted by the agency to FEMA included damaged vehicles that may not have been eligible for reimbursement. We cooperated fully with the subsequent review, and worked together to reach an amicable settlement,” the agency said in a statement.

“As a result of the joint review, NYC DOT has already instituted stronger procedures to reduce the risk of this ever happening again, including a new grants compliance officer and a centralized, comprehensive tracking system for the agency’s thousands of fleet vehicles.”

The nonprofit National Insurance Crime Bureau estimated that 230,000 insurance claims for vehicle damage were made as a result of the storm.

Sandy left cars tossed across Cross Bay Boulevard in Broad Channel, Queens. In lower Manhattan, cars were piled on top of each other in underground parking decks. Close to 20,000 damaged cars were stored on a tarmac in Calverton, L.I.


Continue Reading


Germany: Taxis denounce Transport Ministry’s deregulation plans




uber germany

Conservative Transport Minister Andreas Scheuer (CSU) wants to make it easier for companies like Uber to offer their services in Germany and traditional taxi companies aren’t happy about it.

Uber first launched in Germany in 2014, but a string of court rulings and the country’s restrictive transportation laws have limited it and similar companies from offering their ride-hailing services.

In a white paper published on Monday, the Transport Ministry proposed legal changes to inject more competition into the transportation sector.

Chief among them is scrapping a rule that requires private hire drivers to return to a headquarters after every drop-off. The “obligation to return” — which doesn’t apply to taxi drivers — also forbids ride-hailing drivers from accepting new customers during the ride back.
The paper also proposes getting rid of a ban on pooling, which would allow ride-hailing drivers to pick up and drop off additional customers who are traveling on the same route.

Taxis worry about ‘existence’

The Association of German Taxis and Rental Car Services (BZP) quickly denounced the plans as “unilaterally in favor of Uber and other similar services at the expense of taxis.”

BZP’s managing director, Thomas Grätz, told the DPA news agency that changes to the “obligation to return” rule would threaten the sector’s “very existence.”

The association said it would hold a demonstration against the changes in front of the Transport Ministry building in Berlin on Thursday.

Dieter Schlenker, the chief executive of Taxi Deutschland, a cooperative, said the changes could lead to more New York City-style congestion in major German cities.
Consumers want ‘flexibility’

Germany’s leading consumer group, the Voice of the Consumer (vzbv), has welcomed the changes, saying they would inject “flexibility” into the German transportation market.

“The taxi industry and public transport services do not adequately meet the changing demands of consumers,” vzbv expert Marion Jungbluth told the Handelsblatt newspaper.

Any changes should however protect the consumer and the employees of new transportation services, she said.

The coalition government of conservatives (CDU/CSU) and Social Democrats (SPD) is expected to discuss the white paper and publish a full proposal in the next several months.

The parties agreed to reform the sector in their coalition agreement last year. Many lawmakers see a precedent for reform in the 2013 liberalization of the long-distance bus sector.


Continue Reading