Connect with us

Uber, lyft and other taxis

Where Yellow Cabs Didn’t Go, Green Cabs were Supposed to Thrive. Then Came Uber.

Published

on

yellow cab

Mohammed Uddin was having a foul day, and it was solely lunchtime. He was fourth in line at a green-taxi stand in Astoria, Queens, and never glad about it.

However he was not ready for a inexperienced cab to drag up. He was in a line of inexperienced cabs ready for passengers to select up within the shadow of the Astoria Boulevard subway station.

“I began at 9 o’clock,” stated Mr. Uddin, a green-taxi driver since he left a lodge job on Lengthy Island in 2014. “I made $47 thus far. That’s very unhealthy. If Uber hadn’t are available, it wouldn’t be like this.”

Uber and Lyft, the ride-share providers which have reworked the best way many New Yorkers get round, have plunged the yellow cab trade into an existential disaster. However green-cab drivers are not any much less indignant about app-connected rides, saying that Uber and Lyft have torpedoed their fledgling section of the taxi trade earlier than it even had an opportunity to ascertain itself.

Mayor Invoice de Blasio not too long ago signed a invoice into regulation that capped ride-share automobiles at their present stage, round 100,000, making it the primary main American metropolis to impose a restrict on the booming trade. However drivers like Mr. Uddin stated the cap was unlikely to create a brand new window of alternative for inexperienced cabs, partly as a result of ride-hail automobiles outnumber inexperienced cabs 30 to 1. Metropolis officers estimate the variety of inexperienced cabs on metropolis streets to be round three,500.

Town needed inexperienced taxis to be an antidote to a longstanding drawback: Yellow cabs not often choose up individuals outdoors Manhattan, besides on the airports. However their arrival roughly coincided with the rise of Uber, which, after establishing itself in Manhattan, expanded throughout the town.

“Uber and Lyft actually decimated the inexperienced cab sector,” stated Bhairavi Desai, the chief director of the New York Taxi Staff Alliance, which represents taxi and ride-hail drivers. “There was excessive expectation amongst drivers that this may be a possibility to earn with out the identical stage of stress that you simply face within the yellow-cab trade.”

Uber counters that it helps inexperienced cabs, as a result of many green-taxi operators additionally drive for Uber. An Uber spokesman stated the ride-hail service dispatches greater than 50,000 journeys to inexperienced taxis each month — in fact, for passengers, it may be complicated to order an Uber automobile and have a inexperienced taxi pull as much as the curb. The Uber spokesman, Jason Submit, stated Uber supplied “an unlimited incomes alternative by connecting drivers with extra rides,” particularly in far-flung neighborhoods the place fewer inexperienced cabs flow into in search of passengers.

Uber riders say it’s usually a lot simpler and quicker to get an Uber automobile with a few faucets on a cellphone than to it’s to search for a inexperienced cab to hail on the road.

Figures from the town’s Taxi and Limousine Fee underscore how a lot enterprise for inexperienced cabs has declined since ride-share automobiles arrived. In Might, inexperienced taxis made 25,693 journeys a day throughout the town, a 55 % lower from Might 2015, the busiest month on file, which had 57,637 journeys. Against this, Uber says it dealt with greater than 84,000 journeys to or from a single neighborhood, East New York, Brooklyn, between July 18 and Aug. 15.

For inexperienced cabs, income has declined proportionally as journeys have dwindled, to $386,965 a day citywide in Might 2018, from $862,099 in Might 2015. Inexperienced-cab drivers are working lower than they had been, 5.7 hours in Might 2018, in contrast with 6.5 hours in Might 2015.

Brooklyn accounted for a 3rd of green-cab pickups from January via Might of this 12 months, in line with the taxi fee. Virtually one other third, 31 %, had been in northern Manhattan, and 29.5 % had been in Queens. Against this, solely 5.three % had been within the Bronx, and just one one-hundredth of 1 % on Staten Island.

ImageFor inexperienced cabs, income has declined proportionally as journeys have dwindled, to $386,965 a day citywide in Might 2018, from $862,099 in Might 2015.CreditBryan Thomas for The New York Instances

And, whereas the variety of ride-hail automobiles has soared, the variety of inexperienced cabs has shrunk. A complete of eight,345 permits have been issued since 2013, however the taxi fee considers solely three,514 lively.

As for whether or not Uber had damage the inexperienced cabs, Mr. Submit, the Uber spokesman, stated, “I’d say Uber has constructed a greater mousetrap.”

Inexperienced taxis had been speculated to be that mousetrap — a brand new class for the entrenched taxi trade, created when Michael R. Bloomberg was mayor. “The precise to hail a authorized taxi in all 5 boroughs,” he stated in 2013, was “one thing that New Yorkers have deserved and by no means had.” A survey by the taxi fee discovered that 95 % of yellow taxis picked up passengers under 96th Road in Manhattan and on the airports.

The answer — taxis that might solely function away from the areas dominated by yellow cabs — now appears so 2011, which is when the Bloomberg administration first proposed it. The brand new class of taxis that was created, the inexperienced cabs, couldn’t choose up passengers in Manhattan south of East 96th Road or West 110th Road. They will cease if somebody hails them wherever within the different boroughs, besides on the airports.

By coincidence, 2011 can be when Uber started working in New York.

Now, some passengers say inexperienced cabs tried, however by no means fulfilled their promise.

“They stuffed a vital void in areas like Harlem the place yellow cab service was spotty at greatest” after they first hit the streets, stated Derek Q. Johnson, who lives in Harlem. “However I feel it’s arduous to dispute that the trip is best with Uber and Lyft and the reliability is extra assured.”

Completely different guidelines apply to inexperienced cabs at airports, the place they will drop off passengers however can not choose them up, besides by prearrangement — for instance, if they’re despatched there by a dispatcher. Many drivers complain that these guidelines power them to go to the airports empty if they’re dispatched for a pickup or return empty in the event that they take somebody there. Not like yellow cabs, they can not wait within the taxi traces. Uber and the opposite ride-hailing apps will not be certain by airport guidelines.

The yellow-cab trade responded to the plan for inexperienced cabs by going to courtroom. Yellow cab house owners nervous that the worth of their million-dollar medallions would plummet.

Town gained the courtroom problem and the worth plummeted, however not due to competitors from the inexperienced cabs that went on the streets in 2013.

“Sadly, they got here alongside concurrently Uber and Lyft,” stated Mitchell L. Moss, a professor at New York College the place he’s the director of the Rudin Heart for Transportation Coverage and Administration. “The advantage of Uber is it may well come choose you up in extremely dispersed areas, which the inexperienced taxi can’t actually do as a result of it’s obtained to remain close to dense transit pickup areas.”

Inexperienced cabs, he stated, are “mainly clustering at transit and retail hubs” — close to the place subway traces finish, for instance — as a result of they’re extra more likely to discover passengers there than in the event that they cruise the streets they’re approved to cruise the place persons are not used to seeing cabs. Certainly, Ms. Desai, of the Taxi Staff Alliance, stated that “important street-hail markets” had not developed outdoors Manhattan.

However that was not the one drawback for inexperienced cabs. “Town was form of undercutting them by licensing all these different automobiles” — the ride-share automobiles, stated Graham Hodges, a historian of the taxi trade and a professor at Colgate College, who predicted shakeout is coming.

“There are far too many automobiles on the street, and that’s the place I feel the T.L.C. will tighten up regulation,” he stated, referring to the taxi fee. “And after they do, those with these permits will probably be in the very best authorized state of affairs. They’ll be those that survive.”

Source: https://bylifetoday.com/2018/09/03/nyregion/where-yellow-cabs-didnt-go-green-cabs-were-supposed-to-thrive-then-came-uber/

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uber, lyft and other taxis

Lyft Is Another Step Closer to Driverless Ridesharing

Published

on

By

uber lyft

Ridesharing company Lyft (NASDAQ: LYFT) inched a little bit closer toward self-driving ridesharing last week when it said in a blog post that it’s adding Chrysler Pacifica hybrids to its autonomous vehicle (AV) testing fleet and opening a new self-driving vehicle test facility.

The new facility, located in East Palo Alto, California, will allow the company to increase the number of AV tests it can run. It will also let the company test how the systems do with different road configurations, including intersections, merging lanes, traffic lights, and similar challenges. The company said in the post that the new facility will let Lyft “further accelerate the speed of innovation.”

Lyft says that it’s driving four times more autonomous miles per quarter than it was just six months ago and has about 400 employees worldwide working on self-driving tech. That figure is likely to expand, considering that Lyft has more than 40 autonomous vehicle job openings listed on its website.

In addition to the new facility, Lyft said that it’s adding Pacifica minivans to its AV fleet, which is the same vehicle that Waymo, Alphabet’s self-driving car company, uses for its public self-driving ridesharing project and AV tests. Lyft said that, “The minivan’s size and functionality provide our team with significant flexibility to experiment with the self-driving rideshare experience.”

Why does all this matter for Lyft’s autonomous-vehicle future? Because to have a successful, public self-driving ridesharing fleet in the coming years, Lyft needs to lay the groundwork right now.

Isn’t Lyft already doing AV testing?

Lyft is, of course, already working on AV testing. The company’s original self-driving test facility has been up and running since early 2018. The company also started a partnership with Waymo earlier this year to test autonomous ridesharing. Additionally, Lyft also works with Aptiv, an AV tech company, and together they’ve created “the largest publicly available commercial self-driving program in the country” and have completed more than 75,000 rides through the partnership.

But the recent announcements by Lyft show that the company is taking its AV focus a bit further. The Pacifica minivans have been used by Waymo’s AV ridesharing program in Phoenix for more than a year now, making them a proven choice for shuttling around ride-hailing passengers. Lyft may not be ready to launch a wide-scale autonomous ridesharing service just yet, but testing out these vehicles likely means that it’s moving past earlier stages of AV testing and is now looking at how its next-generation self-driving tech can handle new vehicles.

Why this matters for Lyft

Lyft and other ride-hailing companies, including Uber, are keeping a close eye on self-driving developments and testing out the technologies themselves because it could eventually become an integral part of their business model. Research from Intel predicts that the AV ridesharing market could be worth $3.7 trillion by 2050.

Additionally, as regulations surrounding ridesharing drivers continue to increase, Lyft is likely looking to AVs to eventually replace some human drivers. Just a few months ago, the state of California introduced a bill that could pave the way for independent contractors, including Lyft’s drivers, to be reclassified as employees. If a version of the bill becomes law and other states follow California’s lead, it could significantly increase operating costs for Lyft. That could be bad news for the company, which is unprofitable right now and hoping to be in the black just two years from now.

While Lyft’s announcements may not seem all that significant right now, investors should know that these baby steps moving the company closer to AV ridesharing could have huge results in the coming years. For now, investors should be pleased that Lyft is beefing up its own AV testing. Each move the company makes now means that it’ll be much more ready for a self-driving ridesharing future.

Source www.nasdaq.com

By Chris Neiger

Continue Reading

Uber, lyft and other taxis

Uber fined $650 million by New Jersey over driver classification

Published

on

By

money

New Jersey is the latest state to say Uber’s drivers should be classified as employees rather than independent contractors. The state’s Department of Labor and Workforce Development said that because of this misclassification, the ride-hailing company owes it roughly $650 million in unemployment taxes and disability insurance, according to Bloomberg Law.

The Department of Labor reportedly has been trying to get unpaid employment taxes from Uber going back as far as 2015, according to documents obtained by Bloomberg Law. It said the company owed the state $523 million in overdue taxes along with another $119 million in interest and penalties for the last four years. Uber disputes these findings.

“We are challenging this preliminary but incorrect determination,” an Uber spokesman said in an email. “Because drivers are independent contractors in New Jersey and elsewhere.”

Driver classification is an issue that government regulators have been taking a closer look at over the past year. California passed a law in September that could require Uber and other on-demand companies to reclassify their drivers as employees instead of independent contractors. The law is set to go into effect Jan. 1. New York, Oregon and Washington state have considered similar legislation.

Uber, Lyft and several other tech companies have vowed to fight the California law, collectively putting more than $90 million behind a ballot initiative that’ll take the issue to voters next November. Many drivers have said this move is a slap in the face as they struggle to earn a living wage.

Uber’s and Lyft’s business models depend on bringing aboard hundreds of thousands of independent contractors, whose labor is typically cheaper than that of employees. That’s because Uber and Lyft drivers supply and maintain their own cars and also pay for their own health care and benefits, such as sick days or overtime pay.New Jersey is the latest state to say Uber’s drivers should be classified as employees rather than independent contractors. The state’s Department of Labor and Workforce Development said that because of this misclassification, the ride-hailing company owes it roughly $650 million in unemployment taxes and disability insurance, according to Bloomberg Law.

The Department of Labor reportedly has been trying to get unpaid employment taxes from Uber going back as far as 2015, according to documents obtained by Bloomberg Law. It said the company owed the state $523 million in overdue taxes along with another $119 million in interest and penalties for the last four years. Uber disputes these findings.

“We are challenging this preliminary but incorrect determination,” an Uber spokesman said in an email. “Because drivers are independent contractors in New Jersey and elsewhere.”

Driver classification is an issue that government regulators have been taking a closer look at over the past year. California passed a law in September that could require Uber and other on-demand companies to reclassify their drivers as employees instead of independent contractors. The law is set to go into effect Jan. 1. New York, Oregon and Washington state have considered similar legislation.

Uber, Lyft and several other tech companies have vowed to fight the California law, collectively putting more than $90 million behind a ballot initiative that’ll take the issue to voters next November. Many drivers have said this move is a slap in the face as they struggle to earn a living wage.

Uber’s and Lyft’s business models depend on bringing aboard hundreds of thousands of independent contractors, whose labor is typically cheaper than that of employees. That’s because Uber and Lyft drivers supply and maintain their own cars and also pay for their own health care and benefits, such as sick days or overtime pay.

 

“New Jersey is sending a message that the state’s labor laws aren’t dictated by corporations,” Bhairavi Desai, executive director of the New York Taxi Workers Alliance, said in a statement. “It’s a stinging rebuke of the architects of the gig economy, and we hope it permeates across other sectors.”

Even if Uber’s drivers were determined to be employees rather than independent contractors, Uber said the $650 million New Jersey tax fine would be too high — particularly if it’s based on what the company has earned in the state. Uber didn’t disclose the revenue it generated in New Jersey over the past four years, but its combined revenue for all the markets where it operated in 2018 was $11.3 billion.

 

 

 

Source www.cnet.com

By Dara Kerr

Continue Reading

Uber, lyft and other taxis

Adams Clinical removes hurdle to clinical trial participation

Published

on

By

uber

How Adams Clinical increased retention and streamlined operations by switching to Uber.

One of the hardest parts of conducting a clinical trial is identifying willing participants. Once a participant is identified, strict qualifications and an often-lengthy time commitment limits who can participate, and a lack of access to transportation can make it difficult for participants to commit to and complete the study. To help improve recruitment and retention rates, Adams Clinical offered taxi rides to their participants. However, this solution became a burden on operational efficiency since taxis were only accessible to participants who lived close by and required the staff to pay at the end of each ride.

Finding the perfect transportation solution with Uber Health

To expand their transportation offering, Adams Clinical became an early beta partner with Uber in 2016. The team started using Uber’s web dashboard to arrange and pay for rides for participants with just a few clicks. Over the three years of this partnership, the switch to Uber Health simplified operational management, while reducing time spent on recruitment with increased retention rates. The easy-to-use Uber Health dashboard tracked all the rides and processed payments from one centralized interface, allowing the staff to arrange rides without the hassle of paying at the end of each trip. This flexibility, plus the extensive reach of Uber driver-partners in the Boston area, provided Adams Clinical with the transportation solution needed to successfully manage their participants in need of rides—which removed the headache from recruiting and retaining their study participants.

The result: Improved retention rates, simplified financial records, and an overall lift in team morale

By teaming with Uber Health, Adams Clinical enjoys a number of key benefits including:

• Expanded Recruitment—Using Uber Health cut down the length of enrollment by providing a larger pool to recruit from, resulting in a 5 to 10 percent reduction in recruitment time over the last two years. 

• Centralized Billing—All rides are charged to one company credit card, which is then processed at the end of each month to streamline the amount of administrative effort required.

• Reliable Service—Each ride is tracked in the dashboard so the team knows when the participant will be arriving to help keep the rest of the study on schedule.

• Improved Retention—In the first two years of the partnership with Uber, Adams Clinical estimated up to 20 percent fewer people dropped out of a trial when transportation was arranged to and from the clinic.

• Financial Accountability—Details for each ride are available in the dashboard, and can be downloaded to a spreadsheet, offering convenient management with trial-specific reporting per participant.

• Easy to Use—Using Uber Health has been easy for both staff and participants, even among populations without smartphones or passengers new to Uber.

 

by Kendall Brown

Source uber.com

Continue Reading

Trending

TransportationVoice