Connect with us

Tech

Zuckerberg apologized and told the chronology of events

Published

on

zuckerberg apologized

After 5 days of silence, Mark Zuckerberg offered to testify before the Congress about the scandal with Cambridge Analytica. He also said that the company will analyze all applications that have access to personal information of users, and will limit this access for programmers.

Senator Dianne Goldman Berman Feinstein and other members of the Congress called on Mark to testify, to which he responded: “So the short answer is, is I’m happy to have it the right thing to do. Facebook testifies in Congress regularly on a number of topics, some high-profile, and some not. “. “And our objective is always to provide Congress…to have the most information that they can,” he added.

He wrote on his Facebook page:  “You know, we have a basic responsibility to protect people’s data. And if we can’t do that, then we don’t deserve to have the opportunity to serve people. So our responsibility now is to make sure that this doesn’t happen again”

Mark also described the chronology of events.

In 2013, a researcher from Cambridge University Alexander Kogan created an application for personality tests. It was downloaded by about 300 000 people who shared their data, as well as some of their friends’ information.

“Considering how our platform worked at that time, it meant that Kogan had the opportunity to access tens of millions of data of users’ friends,” the founder of the social network explained.

In 2014, Facebook restricted the access of applications to user information. In particular, developers can no longer ask for information about users’ friends, if they did not consent to it.

“In 2015, we learned from The Guardian journalists that Kogan shared data from his program with Cambridge Analytica. It is against our policies for developers to share data without people’s consent, so we immediately banned Kogan’s app from our platform and demanded that Kogan and Cambridge Analytica formally certify that they had deleted all improperly acquired data,” Zuckerberg said.

According to Zuckerberg, last week he learned from media publications that Cambridge Analytica may not have removed a large chunk of data, as they promised.

“We immediately banned then from using any of our services. Cambridge Analytica claims that they have already deleted the data and agreed to conduct a forensic check by the company that we hired to confirm this fact. We are working with regulators who are also investigating these events,” – informed Zuckerberg

He noted that this scandal was a violation of trust between Kogan, Cambridge Analytica and Facebook, as well as between the social network and its users.

Zuckerberg intends to sell 75 million Facebook shares but the network is losing its patrons because of the scandal.

“And if we find developers who abuse personal information, we will ban their apps and inform the users that might have been influenced by it, as well as those people whose data Kogan misused,” Zuckerberg said.

Tech

New York Times CEO: Facebook Shouldn’t Be ‘World’s Editor in Chief’, Censoring Fake News ‘Not the Right Answer’

Published

on

By

facebook_and_newyorktimes

The CEO of the New York Times slammed Silicon Valley giants yesterday, at an event hosted by the left-leaning Open Markets Institute to discuss the effects of big tech on news and publishing. Warning that Facebook is setting itself up as the “world’s editor in chief,” he also revealed that Mark Zuckerberg had told the Times that they could expect to do “very well” in their rankings of “trusted” news sources.

Despite Facebook’s recent attempts to curry favor with the establishment media, which include biasing their newsfeed algorithm towards establishment sources like CNN and away from independent and alternative media, as well as directly paying establishment outlets for exclusive news content, the corporate media warned that the tech giant was giving itself too much power and responsibility.

“We face an immediate threat” warned New York Times CEO Mark Thompson, “which is that Facebook’s catalogue of missteps with data and extreme and hateful content will lead to a naive attempt to set itself up as the world’s digital editor-in-chief, prioritizing and presumably downranking and rejecting content on a survey and data-driven assessment of whether the provider of the content is ‘broadly trusted’ or not.”

Thompson revealed that Mark Zuckerberg told him that the New York Times could expect to “do very well in such a ranking.”

Nevertheless, Thompson said that the concept of “broadly trusted” sources was a “sinister one.”

“Democracy depends in part on unbounded competition between different journalistic perspectives, and the clash of different judgments and opinions. History suggests that mainstream media organizations frequently get it right, but that not infrequently, the outliers should be listened to.”

“The process of citizens making up their own mind which news sources to believe is messy, and can indeed lead to fake news being believed, but to rob citizens of that ability [and replace it] with a centralized ‘trust’ algorithm will not make democracy healthier but damage it further.”

Instead of “censoring fake news”, Thompson said social media companies should be “giving people enough information to figure out for themselves what to believe and what not to believe.”

Thomspon’s comments highlighted a trend that has also been identified by Breitbart Tech: that Facebook is installing itself as the arbiter of what news sources are “broadly trusted,” usurping power from users in the process. Increasingly, Facebook’s algorithms aren’t designed to promote what its users “like” or follow, but what company executives have decided their users should like.

Thomspon also attacked social media companies for the opacity of their algorithms. “We do not know … how the algorithms of the major platforms sort and prioritize our content, nor can we reliably predict or influence changes in those algorithms, nor in any sense hold the companies to account for those changes.”

“The underlying danger of the agency of editors and the public alike being usurped by centralized algorithms and algorithmic control is present with every digital platform where we do not fully understand how the processes of editorial selection and prioritization take place, which right now means all of them, thus the urgent need for transparency.”

Not everyone at the Open Market Institute’s event, dominated by left-leaning and establishment figures, was in favor of giving power back to users — Mark Zuckerberg’s mentor, for example, told Breitbart News reporter Amanda House that “leaving it to the audience” to decide what counts as fake news is a mistake, and that users believe “sensation over substance.”

 

from breitbart website

Continue Reading

Tech

Apple’s ‘Behind the Mac’ ads have a double meaning

Published

on

By

macbook

Apple just released four new ads focused on the Mac. The ads are teeming with emotion, showing earnest people doing creative things behind their Mac computers. Unfortunately, the series is dubbed ‘Behind the Mac’ at a time when many worry that Apple has lost the plot causing the Mac to fall behind the competition.

Each YouTube video links out to Apple’s Mac page, a page that’s headlined by the $5,000 iMac Pro. However, as noted by Quentin Carnicelli over at Rogue Amoeba, the iMac Pro is the only macOS computer to get an update in the last year. The computers featured in Apple’s new ads are all MacBooks.

 

Right now, Apple’s Mac computers are plagued by a series of concerns. Off the top of my head:

  • The MacBook Pro is a not a computer made for professionals.
  • TouchBar, lol.
  • Mac Pro, ugh.
  • Why is Apple still selling a giant, under-specced, and over-priced Mac Mini that hasn’t been updated or seen a price drop in over four years?
  • When will apple fix the questionable MacBook keyboards?
  • Why hasn’t Apple update its Macs with the latest Intel CPUs yet?

I’m sure the message we’re supposed to take away from the new ad campaign is that Apple is committed to the Mac platform, despite evidence to the contrary. Great. But instead of new ads, wouldn’t it be better if Apple released some new Macs instead?

By 

www.theverge.com

Continue Reading

Tech

The best drones of 2018

Published

on

By

drons

Wish you could fly? Here are the best drones on the market right now

In just the past few years, drones have transformed from a geeky hobbyist affair to a full-on cultural phenomenon. They’re everywhere now, and they’re available in just about any shape, size, or configuration you could ever want.

The market is absolutely saturated with them now, even including some fantastic models under $500. so to help you navigate the increasingly large and ever-changing landscape of consumer UAVs, we put together this definitive list of the best drones on the planet right now. So without further ado, here’s the cream of the quadcopter crop.

At a glance

  • DJI Mavic Air: Best drone overall (4.5 out of 5 stars)
  • Yuneec Breeze: Best drone for beginners (3.5 out of 5 stars)
  • Ryze Tello: Best cheap drone
  • DJI Inspire 2: Best drone for filmmakers (4 out of 5 stars)
  • QAV250 Mini FPV Carbon Fiber Edition: Best drone for racing
  • Parrot Mambo: Best drone for kids
  • DJI Spark: Best selfie drone (4 out of 5 stars)

DJI MAVIC AIR
The best

dji-mavic-air-review-8

Why you should buy this: It has all the features you need in a drone, yet is still compact enough to fit in a backpack or purse

Who it’s for: Anyone looking for a fullfeatured yet highly portable drone

How much it’ll cost: $799

Why we chose the DJI Mavic Air:
What makes the Mavic Air so amazing is that, despite the fact that it’s one of the most compact and portable drones we’ve ever flown, it’s also one of the most capable and full-featured. It’s equipped with a 4K camera, a 3-axis gimbal, forward/backward/downward obstacle avoidance, tons of autopilot modes, range over four miles, and somehow it still fits in the palm of your hand. It’s living proof that scaling down size doesn’t necessarily mean scaling back on features, and that big things really can come in small packages.

The portability factor is huge. Thanks to a very clever hinge system, the Mavic’s arms fold up into a neat little package just smaller than the dimensions of your average brick, which makes it a breeze to stuff in your backpack or messenger bag and lug along on your adventures. Photographers always say that the best camera is the one you have with you, and the same could definitely be said for drones. If it’s portable, you’re far more likely to have it with you when you need it.

When it comes to portable drones, the Mavic Air has no equal — although the Mavic Pro is still a pretty solid contender. It boasts slightly better camera specs and lasts a bit longer in the air, but it also costs an extra $200.

YUNEEC BREEZE
The best drone for beginners

yuneec-breeze-flying

Why you should buy this: Because it’s easy to fly, relatively cheap, reasonably durable, and also provides you with plenty of room to grow and progress as a pilot

Who its for: Novice pilots who want a durable, easy-to-fly drone with a decent camera and a plethora of upgrade options

How much it’ll cost: $200-$230

Why we chose the Yuneec Breeze:
Some people will tell you that beginner pilots should cut their teeth on lower-end drones, but in our expert opinion, that’s nonsense. Why? Crappier drones are harder and less reliable to fly, which means that you’re far more likely to crash and destroy them. We think its a smarter idea to start out with a slightly nicer drone with reliable, responsive controls, a decent warranty, and a design that’s easy to repair or upgrade.

With these goals in mind, Yuneec’s Breeze is a fantastic choice for any greenhorn drone pilot. It is relatively cheap, but not so cheap that you’ll be encouraged to fly carelessly. It also has a pretty decent 4K camera on the undercarriage, and boasts an ultraportable form factor that makes transport, well, a Breeze.

And the best part? You can fly it with your smartphone, or pick up Yuneec’s dedicated controller system if you want tighter, more responsive controls. In other words, if you start with this drone, you’ll be able to learn the ins and outs of piloting a quadcopter — but more importantly, you’ll also be able to upgrade your setup as your skills progress and your needs change.

RYZE TELLO

The best cheap drone

ryze-tello-lifestyle

Why you should buy this: Despite costing just $99 bucks, this little bugger boasts all the essential features you need.

Who it’s for: Anyone who wants an affordable drone that’s easy to fly

How much it’ll cost: $99

Why we chose the Ryze Tello drone: Generally speaking, drones that cost less than $100 bucks aren’t worth your time. They’re flimsy, they lack advanced features, and they’re almost always squirrely as hell in the air. But Tello is different. Despite the fact that it retails for only $99, it boasts a boatload of high-end features and functionality. Under the hood you’ll find a 14-core Intel vision processing chip, flight stabilization tech from DJI, a 5 megapixel camera capable of shooting 720p HD video, and a battery that gets you 13 minutes of flight time.
Unfortunately, this one doesn’t come with a controller, which means you’re forced to pilot Tello via virtual joysticks on a smartphone app: a control method that’s notoriously mushy and imprecise. The good news, though, is that Ryze built the drone with third-party peripherals in mind, so if you prefer to fly with physical sticks under your thumbs, you can pick up a GameSir T1d controller and link it to your bird. We think it’s well worth the extra $30 bucks!

DJI INSPIRE 2
The best drone for filmmakers

inspire-2-lifestyle-10

Why you should buy this: Because it’s a professional camera drone that’s ready to fly, straight out of the box

Who it’s for: Amateur and professional filmmakers who don’t want to build a custom camera drone rig

How much it’ll cost: $3,000

Why we chose the DJI Inspire 2:
There’s a reason you see DJI’s Inspire showing up everywhere from movie sets to Enrique Iglesias concerts — it’s a beast. The Inspire 2 boasts some seriously impressive specs: a controllable range of up to 4.3 miles, a top speed of 67 miles per hour, forward obstacle avoidance, and all the stabilization and autopilot features you could ever ask for in a drone. But the camera is definitely the star of the show.

DJI’s latest Zenmuse cam, the X5S, is a mirrorless Micro Four Thirds camera made specifically for aerial photography and cinematography. It shoots in 5.2K at 30 frames per second (or 4K at 60), takes 20.4 megapixel stills, and boasts a ridiculously wide ISO range of 100 – 25,600. As an added bonus, this rig is cradled inside a vibration dampened 3-axis gimbal, so your footage comes out silky smooth no matter how crazily you fly.
DJI’s control system is also fantastic. The revamped DJI Go app puts all of the camera’s advanced controls right at your fingertips. Shutter speed, aperture, and ISO can be adjusted with just a few taps, and focus can be set by simply tapping on the subject. With a setup like this, you don’t even need prior film experience or piloting skills to get professional-looking footage.

LUMENIER QAV250 MINI FPV CARBON FIBER EDITION
The best drone for racing

inspire-2-lifestyle-10

Why you should buy this: Because you want a drone you can race and upgrade, but don’t want to build one from scratch
Who it’s for: Novice and intermediate racing pilots

How much it’ll cost: $434

Why we chose the Lumenier QAV250 Mini FPV Carbon Fiber Edition:
Lumenier’s QAV250 wins our pick for the best racing drone for a few different reasons, but the first and most important is that it is modular and customizable. You can buy it pre-assembled from Lumenier, and while the stock configuration should be more than enough to satisfy pilots who are new to drone racing, you are also not locked in to that configuration forever. If you ever feel like upgrading your drone, you can easily swap out any of the parts for newer, better gear.

This flexibility is crucial. If you look at the winners of most drone races, you’ll notice that most pros fly their own custom drone rigs that can be tweaked and tuned to boost performance. The technology that powers drone racing is progressing at a breakneck pace, and the last thing you want to do is dump a bunch of money into a pre-built racing rig that’ll become obsolete in a few months. The best course of action is to get a rig that’ll get you in the air and racing, but also allow you to evolve — and that’s precisely what the QAV250 will do.

PARROT MAMBO
The best drone for kids

parrot-mambo-2

Why you should buy this: It’s stable and easy to fly, and it comes with a range of fun attachments.
Who it’s for: Kids and adults who want a drone that can shoot darts

How much it’ll cost: $120

Why we chose the Parrot Mambo:
Truth be told, you can get a cheaper drone that your kid will probably go bonkers over just the same, but they’ll actually be able to fly this one. There are a boatload of mini drones out there right now that you can get for under $50 — but in our experience, the vast majority of them are too squirrelly and difficult to master for your average kid.

Parrot’s new Mambo is different. Unlike most other mini drones, this one is actually designed specifically for kids. In addition to a boatload of motion sensors and advanced autopilot software that keeps the drone stable, Mambo also comes with a handful of attachments that make it more fun and engaging than a basic quadcopter. Inside the box you’ll find a cannon attachment, 50 foam cannon balls, and a grabber arm that can clamp and carry small objects.

And the best part? Parrot also gives you the option of piloting via smartphone or with a dedicated dual-joystick controller. The Flypad, as it’s called, is sold separately for $40 bucks, but it might be worth the extra dough if you don’t have a spare smartphone lying around and don’t feel like handing your kid your brand new iPhone every time he/she feels like flying.

DJI SPARK
The best selfie drone

best-drones-dji-spark-lifestyle

Why you should buy this: Because you want something portable that you can fly without a controller

Who it’s for: Anyone who wants to take epic selfies

How much it’ll cost: $500

Why we chose the DJI Spark:

If there’s one thing DJI is good at, it’s stuffing a ton of features and functionality into increasingly small drones — and nothing showcases this talent more than the Spark. Despite the fact that the drone’s hull is roughly the size of a Twinkie, DJI somehow managed to cram in many of the same goodies you’d find under the hood of the Spark’s bigger, bulkier, and more expensive brothers.
Aside from its tiny and hyper-portable design, the Spark’s biggest feature is arguably its plethora of intelligent flying modes. In addition to DJI’s standard stuff, the Spark sports a handful of brand-new modes, including Rocket, Dronie, Circle, and Helix (more on those in a moment). The drone also comes with gesture recognition abilities, which allow it to be operated without a smartphone or controller.

Another big addition is Spark’s obstacle avoidance system. While the ability to sense and avoid objects is usually a feature reserved for larger drones, DJI went ahead and built one into the hull of the Spark. It’s not quite as robust as what you’ll find on the Phantom 4, or even the Mavic Pro, but it still serves its purpose, and helps you avoid crashes.

Oh, and let’s not forget about the camera. In addition to a 12-megapixel camera that shoots video in 1080p at 30 frames per second, the Spark also sports a two-axis gimbal. This lets it mechanically stabilize the camera and cancel out any jarring, shaky movements — resulting in smoother, better-looking footage. This also gives it a leg up on the competition; most selfie drones only feature single-axis mechanical stabilization.

HOW WE TEST DRONES

  • Build quality & Design

the first thing we do when we get a new drone is beat it up a little bit. We don’t kick it down the stairs or anything, but we’ll give it a few knocks, twists, and shallow drops to assess the build quality and durability. Does it feel flimsy, or does it feel like it could survive a crash landing in the park? We give each review unit a light beating (and usually a couple unintentional crash landings) before we give you a definitive answer on how durable it is.

  • Flight performance, range, and autonomy

To gauge flight performance, we put the drone through a number of tests to see how the manufacturer’s claims hold up. First we take it to a local football field and see how fast it can clear 100 yards, then do some calculations to get an objective reading on speed in miles per hour. After that, we do a similar test to assess ascent and descent speeds, and all the while, we’re also taking notes on how responsive the controls are, how stable the craft is, how far it can go before it’s out of range, and what the overall piloting experience is like compared to other drones.

  • Battery life and charge time

After we’ve taken the drone out to play for a while and jotted down a few notes about how long the battery lasts, we put it on the charger and grab a stopwatch to determine recharge time. Then we take it back out and do a hover test. By flying the drone in the least demanding conditions, we can get a sense of what the maximum flight time is. And finally, we take it out a few more good, hard flights to find out how long the battery lasts (on average) under normal conditions.

  • Camera, accessories, and upgradability

If the drone we’re testing happens to have a camera capable of recording, we capture as much footage as we possibly can. We’ll shoot in dark places, light places, and places with lots of color and contrast. This footage is then compared to all the highlight reels that we filmed with other drones, which helps us get a sense of the camera’s strengths and weaknesses. We also test any accessories that accompany the camera, like lenses, filters, gimbals, or FPV goggles. Finally, we’ll also let you know if the camera setup is upgradable, so you wont be stuck with an outdated shooter in two years.

Source: https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/best-drones/

Continue Reading

Trending

TransportationVoice